Abstracting and Indexing

  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
  • Scilit
  • CrossRef
  • WorldCat
  • ResearchGate
  • Academic Keys
  • DRJI
  • Microsoft Academic
  • Academia.edu
  • OpenAIRE
  • Scribd
  • Baidu Scholar

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism of ADIPOQ Gene (Rs822393) Is Associated with Lipid Profile, Adiponectin Levels and Ratio of Adiponectin/Leptin ratio in Adult Obese Subjects

Article Information

Daniel de Luis*, Olatz Izaola, David Primo, Rocio Aller

Endocrinology and Nutrition Research Center, School of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clinico Universitario, University of  Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

*Corresponding Author: Daniel de Luis, Endocrinology and Nutrition Research Center. School of Medicine, Valladolid University, C/Los perales 16 Simancas, 47130 Valladolid Spain

Received: 26 December 2020; Accepted: 04 January 2020; Published: 11 January 2021

Citation: Daniel de Luis, Olatz Izaola, David Primo, Rocio Aller. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism of ADIPOQ Gene (Rs822393) Is Associated with Lipid Profile, Adiponectin Levels and Ratio of Adiponectin/Leptin ratio in Adult Obese Subjects. Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 5 (2021): 61-72.

View / Download Pdf Share at Facebook

Abstract

Objectives: Some studies in the literature indicate that ADIPOQ rs822393 polymorphism functionally regulates adiponectin levels. The aim of this study was to describe the association of rs822393 with adiponectin levels, cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes mellitus type 2 and metabolic syndrome.

Patients and Methods: The study involved a population of 1004 Caucasian adult obese subjects. Anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, C-reactive protein (CRP), insulin concentration, insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), lipid profile, adipokines levels, ratio adiponectin/leptin ratio and prevalence of MS were recorded. Genotype of ADIPOQ gene polymorphism (rs822393) was evaluated.

Results: The distribution of the rs822393 polymorphism in this adult population was 62.1% (n=623) (CC), 32.1% (n=322) (CT) and 5.8% (n=59) (TT). We observed an association between the minor T allele and lower HDL cholesterol levels (CC vs. CT+TT: delta: 6.6+1.2 mg/ml;p=0.03) and lower adiponectin levels (CC vs. CT+TT: delta: 19.9+3.2 mg/ml;p=0.02). T allele carriers showed lower adiponectin/leptin ratio (CC vs. CT+TT: delta: 0.29+0.1 mg/ml;p=0.02) than non T allele carriers. Logistic regression showed that the T allele increased the risk of low HDL cholesterol (OR=2.75, 95% CI=1.87-4.02, p=0.03), after adjusting by BMI and age.

Keywords

Adiponectin; Adiponectin/leptin ratio; HDL-cholesterol; Metabolic Syndrome; rs822393

Adiponectin articles; Adiponectin/leptin ratio articles; HDL-cholesterol articles; Metabolic Syndrome articles; rs822393 articles

Article Details

1. Introduction

Obesity is a main factor in the development of diseases such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus type 2, dyslipidemia and cardiovascular diseases [1]. Adipose tissue is a relevant organ that secretes adipokines and many proteins produced by adipose tissue have been described, which may provide the link between obesity, insulin resistance and lipid profile [2]. Adiponectin is the most quantitatively abundant adipokine produced by adipocytes, and concentrations of adiponectin are reduced in obese subjects [3]. Adiponectin is encoded by the adiponectin C1Q and collagen domain containing (ADIPOQ) gene, which is located on chromosome 3 at q27. In this area, genome wide scans have detected a susceptibility locus for obesity and diabetes mellitus type 2 [4].  In humans, many polymorphisms in ADIPOQ gene have implied on adiponectin levels, insulin resistance and obesity [5], too.

One common single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of this gene is rs822393 (-4522C/T), it is located in the proximal promoter region of the ADIPOQ gene. Interesting SNPs candidates would be those that have a wide range of physiological effects like lipid and glucose homeostasis. Some studies in the literature indicate that ADIPOQ rs822393 polymorphism functionally regulates adiponectin promoter activity and is associated with hypoadiponectinemia [6].  This ADIPOQ variant has been identified to be associated with adiponectin levels and is related with lipid profile in an adolescent population [7]. In some ethnic groups (Indian), this SNP has been associated with the risk of diabetes mellitus [8].  Despite these previously mentioned relationships, there is no study evaluating the relationship of this SNP with the metabolic syndrome or any of its components in adult obese Caucasian populations. Metabolic syndrome (MS) is defined by the clustering of several factors; abdominal obesity, glucose intolerance and/or insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and increased blood pressure [9].

The aim of the present investigation was to describe the association of rs822393 with adiponectin levels, cardiovascular risk factors, diabetes mellitus type 2 and metabolic syndrome in an  adult obese Caucasian population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Subjects and clinical investigation

A total of 1004 unrelated study subjects were recruited from obese patients sent by the primary care physicians of our Health Area, obesity is defined by a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2. These obese Caucasian subjects were enrolled in a non-probabilistic consecutive method of sampling. The enrolled subjects fulfilled the following inclusion criteria;  body mass index > 30 kg/m2, had no a history of cardiovascular disease, lack of severe renal or hepatic disorders, had no history of alcoholism,  active malignant tumor, previous bariatric surgery, and within the 6 months before the study were not receiving medications known to influence lipid profile (statins, hormonal therapy, glucocorticoids and anti-inflammatory drugs). The exclusion criteria were ages under 20 years or older than 70 years, BMI over 40 kg/m2 years old, and a hypocaloric dietary intervention 3 months prior to the current study.

Informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Our Ethics Committee (HCUVA Committee) in accordance with the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki approved the study. After signed consent was obtained, all participants underwent a medical evaluation including physical examination and complete medical history.

Classical anthropometric parameters (weight, height, body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference) were collected. Body fat mass was assessed by impedanciometry.  We collected blood samples after a 10-hour overnight fasting state with the consequent biochemistry assays and genetic analysis. The following parameters were measured; lipid profile (total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides), plasma C reactive protein (CRP), adipokine levels (leptin, total adiponectin and resistin) and insulin.

To evaluate the prevalence of diabetes mellitus type 2, we used American Diabetes Association criteria (fasting glucose above 126 mg/dl or HBA1c >6.5% or glucose oral overload with a glucose levels at 120 minutes above 200 mg/dl) [10]. In order to calculate the prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome (MS), the definitions of the ATPIII was used [1]. Subjects need to fulfill at least 3 of the following 5 criteria in order to be diagnosed of MS; elevated systolic or diastolic blood pressure (>130/85 mmHg or antihypertensive treatment), hyperglycaemia elevated fasting glucose or treatment for diabetes as hyperglycemia, elevated triglycerides (>150 mg/dl) or treatment for dyslipidemia, low HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dl (males) or <50 mg/dl (females), and increased waist circumference (>94 cm (males) or >80 cm (females)).

2.2 Phenotype measurements

Weight and height were measured on the subjects barefooted and lightly clothed. Weight was measured using scales (Omrom, LA, CA, USA) and recorded to the nearest 50 g. Height was measured with a tape measure (Omrom, LA, CA, USA) while patients were standing with shoulders in normal alignment and no wearing shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as body weight (in kg) divided by height (in m2), and obesity was defined as BMI >30 kg/m2. Waist circumferences (WC) were measured at the umbilical level with the use of an upstretched tape measure while the subjects were standing after normal expiration. Impedanciometry was used to determine body composition with an accuracy of 5 g [11] (EFG, Akern, Pisa, It).  Blood pressure was measured three times from the left arm of seated subjects with a blood pressure monitor (Omrom, LA, CA, USA) after 30 minutes of rest. The average of the two last measurements were recorded for each subject.

2.3 Biochemical measurements

Total cholesterol and triglyceride levels were determined by enzymatic colorimetric assay (Technicon Instruments, Ltd., New York, N.Y., USA), while HDL cholesterol was measured in the supernatant after precipitation of other lipoproteins by enzymatic methods. LDL cholesterol was calculated using Friedewald equation (LDL cholesterol= total cholesterol-HDL cholesterol-triglycerides/5) [12]. Glucose levels were measured by an automated glucose oxidase method (Glucose analyser 2, Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA, USA). Insulin was determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA) (RIA Diagnostic Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA) with a sensitivity of 0.5mUI/L (normal range 0.5-30 mUI/L) [13] and the homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated using these parameters [14]. C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured by immunoturbimetry (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Baden-Wurtemberg Germany), with a normal range of (0-7 mg/dl) and analytical sensivity 0.5 mg/dl. Adipokines were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Resistin was measured with the commercial kit assay (Biovendor Laboratory, Inc., Brno,Moravia,  Czech Republic) (sensitivity of 0.2 µg/ml and a normal range of 4-12 µg/ml) [15]. Adiponectin was measured with (R&D systems, Inc., Mineapolis, Minnesota,  USA) (sensitivity of 0.24 µg/ml  and normal range of 8.63-21.42 µg/ml [16]. Finally, leptin was measured with (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc., Houston, Texas, USA) (sensitivity of 0.05 µg/ml and a normal range of 11-100 µg/ml) [17].

2.4 Genotyping ADIPOQ gene

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leucocytes (300 uL of blood.) by QIAamp ® DNA blood kit following the manufacturer’s instructions. Oligonucleotide primers and probes were designed with the Beacon Designer 5.0 (Premier Biosoft International ®, LA, CA, USA). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was realized with 50 ng of genomic DNA, 0.5 uL of each oligonucleotide primer (primer forward: 5’- ACGTTGGATGAAAGCATGACACGGAGCTTC  -3’ and reverse 5’- ACGTTGGATGAACCCTCACCCATGTCAGC -3’ in a 2 uL final volume (Termociclador Life Tecnologies, LA, CA, USA). DNA was denatured at 90ºC for 2 min; this was followed by 50 cycles of denaturation at 90ºC for 30 s, and annealing at 56.1º C for 60 s). The PCR were run in a 30 uL final volume containing 15 uL of IQTM Supermix (Bio-Rad®, Hercules, CA, USA) with hot start Taq DNA polymerase. We used as internal standard for RT-PCR (GAPDH) with a forward sequence‎: ‎GTCTCCTCTGACTTCAA and reverse sequence‎: ‎ACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA. Hardy Weinberg equilibrium was assessed with a statistical test (Chi-square) to compare our expected and observed counts. The variant was in Hardy Weinberg equilibrium (p=0.28).

2.5 Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by SPSS for Windows, version 23.0 software package (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Sample size was calculated to detect differences over 3 mg/dl of HDL-cholesterol between genotype groups with 90% power and 5% significance. The biochemical parameter values were reported as  mean±standard deviation and were compared by Student´s t-test if they were in Gaussian distribution and compared by non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test. Logistic regression analyses adjusted by age, gender and BMI were used to calculated odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to estimate the association of the rs822393 SNP with the risk of Metabolic syndrome, components of MS and diabetes mellitus type 2. A p-value under 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analysis were performed under a dominant genetic model with rs822393 T- allele as the risk allele (CC+CT vs. TT).

3. Results

A total of 1004 Caucasian obese subjects completed the study. The mean age was 46.9+6.2 years (range: 26-64) and a sex ratio of 733 females (73.0%) and 271 males (27.0%). The mean body mass index (BMI) 36.8+2.9 kg/m2 (range:31.5-39.7). The distribution of the rs822393 polymorphism in this adult population was 62.1% (n=623) (CC), 32.1% (n=322) (CT) and 5.8% (n=59) (TT). The allele frequency was C (0.63) and T (0.37).

For the statistical analysis, the patients were grouped into two genotype groups (CC vs. CT+TT). Age was similar in both genotype groups (CC; 47.0+3.1 years vs. CT+TT; 46.8+5.2 years: ns). Sex ratio was equal in both genotype groups (CC 26.2% males vs. 73.8% females vs. CT+TT; 28.3% males vs. 71.7% females).

Applying a dominant genetic model, we did not observe a significant association between rs822393 T-allele and anthropometric parameters such as fat mass, weight, waist circumference BMI and blood pressure. As expected, males had higher weight, fat mass and waist circumference than females in both genotype groups. In the remaining analysis by sex groups, we did not detect statistically significant differences between both genotypes (Table 1).

 

Total group (n=1004)

Male (n=271)

Female (n=733)

Parameters

CC

n=623

CT+TT

n=381

CC

n=163

CT+TT

n=108

CC

n=460

CT+TT

n=273

BMI

36.9±3.0

36.7±4.0

36.1±3.1

36.2±3.2

36.9±3.1

36.8±3.0

Weight (kg)

94.9±7.0

94.0±8.7

106.1±9.1*

107.3±9.0*

90.9±8.2

89.3±5.7

Fat mass (kg)

39.6±6.1

38.8±7.0

33.4±3.1*

34.0±3.2*

41.9±4.1

40.7±4.3

WC (cm)

112.0±7.0

110.1±7

118.9±6.1*

118.7±5.9*

109.7±4.2

107.8±5.3

SBP (mmHg)

127.0±9.0 

127.2±8.1 

128.2±7.8 

129.3±6.0 

126.3±5.8 

126.9±5.2 

DBP (mmHg)

81.8±5.2 

81.9±3.8

82.3±5.1 

82.5±4.4

80.9±5.0 

81.4±4.2

BMI: body mass index DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; WC, waist circumference; *p<0.05, between genders. No statistical differences between genotype groups.

Table 1:Anthropometric variables and blood pressure.

Biochemical characteristics according to genotype are shown in table 2. In the total group, there were no differences in the parameters related to glucidic metabolism (glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR) or CRP levels. We observed an association between the minor T allele of polymorphism and lower HDL cholesterol levels under the dominant model (CC vs. CT+TT: delta: 6.6+1.2 mg/ml;p=0.03). This significant difference in HDL cholesterol levels was maintained in male patients (CC vs. CT+TT: delta: 6.3+1.1 mg/ml;p=0.02) and also in females (CC vs. CT+TT: delta: 6.7+0.9 mg/ml;p=0.03). No significant differences were detected in the rest of the lipid profile parameters (total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides).

 

Total group (n=1004)

Male (n=271)

Female (n=733)

Parameters

CC

n=623

CT+TT

n=381

CC

n=163

CT+TT

n=108

CC

n=460

CT+TT

n=273

Fasting Glucose (mg/dl)

102.0±7.9

101.6±7.1

105.4±7.1

104.5±6.2

100.8±5.1

99.8±4.1

Total cholesterol (mg/dl)

209.3±20.8

201.1±18.2

204.5±12.6

199.7±20.1

210.5±19.6

204.1±20.1

LDL-cholesterol (mg/dl)

128.1±10.2

127.6±9.1 

127.2±12.3

125.3±12.1

128.5±12.1

128.9±10.1

HDL-cholesterol (mg/dl)

53.3±3.0

45.7±2.9*

50.1±2.4

43.8±7.2*

56.7±3.0

50.1±2.1 *

Triglycerides (mg/dl)

128.2±38.1

125.6±21.7

142.1±31.9

144.9±31.9

118.1±17.1

118.4±13.1

Insulin (mUI/l)

13.7±5.9

14.4±5.9

16.3±4.0

17.0±5.2

12.8±4.5

12.4±5.1

HOMA-IR

3.5±1.8

3.7±1.9

4.1±1.1$

5.0±1.3

3.2±1.0

3.1±1.1

HOMA-IR (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance).; *p<0.05, in CC vs. CT+TT genotypes.

Table 2: Biochemical parameters (mean±SD).

 

Total group (n=1004)

Male (n=271)

Female (n=733)

Parameters

CC

n=623

CT+TT

n=381

CC

n=163

CT+TT

n=108

CC

n=460

CT+TT

n=273

Resistin (µg/dl)

 5.3±1.3

5.2±1.1

 5.1±1.1

5.3±1.7

5.5±1.2     

5.2±1.3

Adiponectin (µg/dl)

41.3±8.0

21.2±5.9*

31.1±7.1

11.2±4.1*

43.1±4.7

24.4±3.9*

Leptin (µg/dl)

64.1±12.9

60.2±11.3

31.2±10.2

35.8±10.4

76.7±8.1$

71.8±12.4$

Ratio adiponectin/leptin

0.63±0.3

0.35±0.1*

0.97±0.2

0.31±0.3*

0.56±0.2

0.35±0.1*

CRP (µg/dl)

5.6±1.2

5.7±1.5

5.4±1.9

5.7±1.8

5.7±1.2

5.6±1.1

CRP: C reactive protein. p<0.05, in CC vs. CT+TT genotypes.$  p<0.05 between genders

 

Table 3: Serum adipokine levels and C reactive protein (mean±SD).

C reactive protein (CRP) and plasma adipokine levels are shown in table 3. In both genotypes, leptin levels were higher in females than males. Again, we detected a relation between the minor T allele of rs822393 polymorphism and lower adiponectin levels under the dominant model (CC vs. CT+TT: delta: 19.9+3.2 mg/ml;p=0.02).  In males, adiponectin levels (CC vs. CT+TT: delta: 18.8+3.9 µg/ml;p=0.03) and in females  (delta: 20.1+3.8 µg/ml;p=0.01) were lower in T allele carriers than non T allele carriers, too. The adiponectin/leptin ratio also showed the same differences by genotypes. T allele carriers showed lower ratio (CC vs. CT+TT: delta: 0.29+0.1 mg/ml;p=0.02) than non T allele carriers. This statistic difference was maintained in males (CC vs. CT+TT: delta: 0.53+0.4 mg/ml;p=0.01) and females (CC vs. CT+TT: delta: 0.28+0.2 mg/ml;p=0.03), too.

Total group (n=1004)

Male (n=271)

Female (n=733)

Parameters

CC

n=623

CT+TT

n=381

CC

n=163

CT+TT

n=108

CC

n=460

CT+TT

n=273

Percentage of MetS

53.8%

53.9%

58.9%

59.4%

43.7%$

37.7% $

Percentage of central obesity

81.5%

79.6%

95.5%

97.1%

76.7%$

72.7%$

Percentage of Hypertriglyceridemia

12.6%

9.7% 

15.2%

10.5% 

11.8%

9.4% 

Low HDL cholesterol

9.5%

22.1%*

10.4%

22.2%*

9.8%

22.7%*

Percentage of Hypertension

44.3%

43.5%

50.6%

54.5%

42.1%

39.8%

Percentage of

hyperglycemia 

23.2%

22.6%

28.5%

31.1%

21.5%$

29.5%

Diabetes Mellitus

9.4%

10.4%

9.6%

12.1%

9.3%

9.7%

The cutoff points for the criteria of; central obesity (waist circumference >88 cm in female and >102 in male), hypertension (systolic BP>130 mmHg or diastolic BP>85 mmHg or specific treatment),  hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides >150 mg/dl or specific treatment), low HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dl (males) or <50 mg/dl (females) or hyperglycemia (fasting plasma glucose >110 mg/dl or drug treatment for elevated blood glucose).  Diabetes mellitus by American diabetes Association (ref 10)*p<0.05, in CC vs. CT+TT genotypes.$  p<0.05 between genders.

Table 4:  Metabolic syndrome, components of MetS and diabetes mellitus.

Table 4 shows the percentages of metabolic syndrome (MS), different components of MS (central obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension,  hyperglycemia and low HDL-levels) and diabetes mellitus type 2. In the all group, the percentage of individuals who had metabolic syndrome (MS) was 46.2% (n=463) and 53.8% patients without MS (n=541). In both genotypes, metabolic syndrome rate and percentage of central obesity were higher in males than females. T allele carriers had a higher percentage of low HDL cholesterol.

Logistic regression showed that the T allele increased the risk of low HDL cholesterol (OR=2.75, 95% CI=1.87-4.02, p=0.03), after adjusting by BMI and age. This association remained in males; risk of low HDL-cholesterol (OR=2.44, 95% CI=1.66-3.57, p=0.03). The analysis in female group showed the same results; risk of low HDL-cholesterol (OR=2.92, 95% CI=1.99-4.26, p=0.02), after adjusting by BMI and age, too.

4. Discussion

The primary findings of this study are the detected significant associations between the rs822393 and low levels of HDL cholesterol, adiponectin and adiponectin/leptin ratio. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the association between this ADIPOQ gene polymorphism and Metabolic Syndrome in Caucasian adults obese subjects. According to literature, more than 500 SNPs map within the adiponectin locus. One of these common genetic variants is rs822393. However, the data in the literature on the role of this SNP in the metabolism of obese patients are scarce and contradictory. For example, He et al  [18] did not detect any significant associations between this SNP and neither adiponectin levels nor metabolic parameters. In contrast, Salazar et al [7] reported strong associations between rs822393 polymorphism and HDL-cholesterol levels as our results. Salazar's study was carried out in an adolescent and Hispanic population [7], this population is very different of our Caucasian adult obese population. Therefore, these concordant results are not population-dependent. Our findings are of potential importance because of the strong evidence of the inverse association between HDL-cholesterol levels and cardiovascular disease [19].

Adiponectin regulates lipid and glucose metabolism, modulating the development of multiple disorders including diabetes mellitus and obesity. A possible mechanism that may explain the detected associations in our study is that this SNP of ADIPOQ could alter adiponectin functions and therefore modify lipid levels. Adiponectin increases serum HDL cholesterol [20] through the following mechanisms; via the activation of lipoprotein lipase and ATP-binding cassette trasporter A1 and inhibition of hepatic lipase [21] and via the increase of the hepatic production of ApoA1, the main apolipoprotein of HDL-cholesterol [22]. Our results are in line with this hypothesis, with a significant low adiponectin levels in T allele carriers. This decrease could be explained by the fact that this SNP is an intronic variant with the potential capacity to modify the alternative-splicing pattern [23].

In our study, we did not find any relationship of rs822393 with obesity-related parameters. Moreover, Zayani et al [24] reported that this SNP and others in ADIPOQ gene were related with BMI, subjects with T allele showed higher BMI than non-T allele carriers.  The results in the literature are contradictory, for example, Peralta et al [25] did not find any relationship of this SNP with different anthropometric parameters related to obesity.  Different populations studied and their different genetic background may explain these differences.

On the other hand, some studies [26] have shown a relationship between SNP rs822393 and insulin resistance in a Caucasian population. The association was stronger in parents than the offspring. This could indicate that the influence of variants in adiponectin on insulin sensitivity may take many years to manifest. However, in a study carried out in southern India [8], no relationship of this polymorphism with diabetes mellitus or metabolic syndrome was detected, only a slight relationship was detected when analyzing a haplotype with 8 different variants of the ADIPOQ gene. These results being in line with those obtained in our work. The association of the T allele with lower levels of adiponectin has been described more frequently in the literature [26], and this could explain, as we have previously commented, our findings in HDL cholesterol levels. In the CARDIA study (Coronary artery development in young adults) a very strong relationship was demonstrated in a young Caucasian population [27] between this polymorphism and low levels of adiponectin.  An additional finding in our work was the relationship of this SNP with the adiponectin/leptin ratio. Leptin, another adipocyte-derived factor, parallels the degree of adiposity [28]. The adiponectin/leptin ratio is a marker of adipose tissue disfunction and inflammation [29]. For example, an adiponectine/leptin ratio higher than 1 can be considered as normal whereas a ratio below or near to 0.5 may indicate an increase in the metabolic risk [30], as shown by the carriers of the T allele.

Some limitations of this study should also be acknowledged when interpreting our findings. First limitation is the cross-sectional design of this study, so causality associations could not be determined. Second, the associations between this SNP and metabolic parameters could be modified by gene-gene and gene-environmental interactions. Third, unfortunately we did not measure APOA-1 concentration in our study, an interesting molecule in the metabolism of HDL cholesterol.  Fourth, the study has been realized in obese subjects, so the data are not generalizable to the entire population. Finally, we have evaluated only Caucasian subjects, ethnic differences in genetic background and the environment they live in would play a crucial role in genetic effects.

In conclusion, we observed an association between rs822393 polymorphism with HDL-cholesterol, adiponectin and adiponectin/leptin ratio in Caucasian adult obese subjects. With future prospects, these data could be helpful to program clinical and health strategies, using this SNP to support the individual classical risk factor determination in this high-risk population of overweight subjects.  Of note, is however, that further research is needed to assess the link between this SNP and others with adiponectin levels, metabolic syndrome and promising index such as ratio adiponectin/leptin [31-32].

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (HVUVA committee 4/2017) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding Sources

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of Interests

All authors have no conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Authors Contribution

Daniel Antonio de Luis designed the study an wrote the article

Olatz Izaola realized nutritional evaluation

R Aller realized laboratory analysis

D Primo  realized nutritional evaluation

References

  1. Expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). JAMA 285 (2001): 2486-2497
  2. de Luis DA, Aller R, Izaola O, Bachiller R. Role of rs6923761 gene variant in glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor in basal GLP-1 levels, cardiovascular risk factor and serum adipokine levels in naïve type 2 diabetic patients. J Endocrinol Invest 38 (2015):143-147.
  3. Yang WS, Chuang LM. Human genetics of adiponectin in the metabolic syndrome. J Mol Med 84 (2006): 112-121
  4. Comuzzie AG, Funahashi T, Sonnenberg G. The genetic basis of plasma variation in adiponectin, a global endophenotype for obesity and the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86 (2001): 4321-4325.
  5. Yamagata K, Matsukawa Y, Okutomi K, Horie M, Shimomura I, et al. Genomic structure and mutations in adipose-specific gene, adiponectin. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24 (2000): 861-868.
  6. Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Pankow JS, Jacobs Jr DR, Steinberger J, Moran A, et al. The association of SNPs in ADIPOQ, ADIPOR1, and ADIPOR2 with insulin sensitivity in a cohort of adolescents and their parents. Hum. Genet 125 (2009): 21-28.
  7. Salazar-Tortosa DF, Pascual-Gamarra JM, Labayen I, Rupérez AI, Censi L, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of ADIPOQ gene associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors in European adolescents: the Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence study. J Hypertens 38 (2020):1971-1979.
  8. Ramya K, Ayyappa KA, Ghosh S, Mohan V, Radha V. Genetic association of ADIPOQ gene variants with type 2 diabetes, obesity and serum adiponectin levels in south Indian population. Gene 15 (2013): 253-262.
  9. Valdés S, García-Torres F, Maldonado-Araque C, Goday A, Calle-Pascual A, et al. Prevalenceof obesity, diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors in Andalusia (southern Spain). Comparison with national prevalence The Di@bet.es study. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 67 (2014): 442-448.
  10. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020: Summary of Revisions. Diabetes Care 40 (2020): S4-S5.
  11. Lukaski H, Johson PE. Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements of the human body. Am J Clin Nutr 41 (1985): 810-817.
  12. Friedewald WT, Levy RJ, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 18 (1972): 499-502.
  13. Duart MJ, Arroyo CO, Moreno JL. Validation of an insulin model for the reactions in RIA. Clin Chem Lab Med 40 (2002):1161-1167.
  14. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28 (1985): 412-414.
  15. Meier U, Gressner M. Endocrine regulation of energy metabolism: review of pathobiochemical and clinical chemical aspects of leptin, Ghrelin, adiponectin, and resistin. Clinical Chemistry 50 (2004): 1511-1525.
  16. Pfutzner A, Langefeld M, Kunt T. Evaluation of human resistin assays with serum from patients with type 2 diabetes and different degrees of insulin resistance. Clin Lab 49 (2003): 571-576.
  17. Suominen P. Evaluation of an enzyme immunometric assay to measure serum adiponectin concentrations. Clin Chem 50 (2004): 219-221.
  18. Won HH, Natarajan P, Dobbyn A, Jordan DM, Roussos P, et al. Disproportionate Contributions of Select Genomic Compartments and Cell Types to Genetic Risk for Coronary Artery Disease. PLoS Genet 11 (2015): e1005622.
  19. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration group. The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration: analysis of individual data on lipid, inflammatory and other markers in over 1.1 million participants in 104 prospective studies of cardiovascular diseases. Eur J Epidemiol 22 (2007): 839-869.
  20. Christou GA, Kiortsis DN. Adiponectin and lipoprotein metabolism. Obes Rev 14 (2013): 939-949.
  21. Yanai H, Yoshida H. Beneficial Effects of Adiponectin on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism and Atherosclerotic Progression: Mechanisms and Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 20 (2019): 1190.
  22. Van Linthout S, Foryst-Ludwig A, Spillmann F, Peng J, Feng Y, et al. Impact of HDL on adipose tissue metabolism and adiponectin expression. Atherosclerosis 210 (2010): 438-444.
  23. Jacob AG, Smith CWJ. Intron retention as a component of regulated gene expression programs. Hum Genet 136 (2017):1043-1057.
  24. Zayani N, Omezzine A, Boumaiza I, Achour O, Rebhi L, et al. Association of ADIPOQ, leptin, LEPR, and resistin polymorphisms with obesity parameters in Hammam Sousse Sahloul Heart Study. J Clin Lab Anal 31 (2017): e22148.
  25. Peralta Romero JJ, Karam Araujo R, Burguete García AI, Estrada Velasco BI, López Islas C, et al. ADIPOQ and ADIPOR2 gene polymorphisms: association with overweight/obesity in Mexican children. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 72 (2015): 26-33.
  26. Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Pankow JS, Jacobs DR Jr, Steinberger J, Moran A, Sinaiko AR. The association of SNPs in ADIPOQ, ADIPOR1, and ADIPOR2 with insulin sensitivity in a cohort of adolescents and their parents. Hum Genet 125 (2009): 21-28.
  27. Wassel CL, Pankow JS, Jacobs DR Jr, Steffes MW, Li N, et al. Variants in the adiponectin gene and serum adiponectin: the Coronary Artery Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 18 (2010): 2333-2338.
  28. Frühbeck G, Gómez-Ambrosi J. Control of body weight: a physiologic and transgenic perspective. Diabetologia 46 (2003): 143-172.
  29. Frühbeck G, Catalán V, Rodríguez A, Ramírez B, Becerril S, et al. Adiponectin-leptin Ratio is a Functional Biomarker of Adipose Tissue Inflammation. Nutrients 22 (2019): 454.
  30. Frühbeck G, Catalán V, Rodríguez A, Gómez-Ambrosi J. Adiponectin-leptin ratio: A promising index to estimate adipose tissue dysfunction. Relation with obesity-associated cardiometabolic risk. Adipocyte 2 (2018): 57-62.
  31. de Luis DA, Calvo SG, Pacheco D, Ovalle HF, Aller R. Adiponectin gene variant RS rs266729: Relation to lipid profile changes and circulating adiponectin after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14 (2018): 1402-1408.
  32. de Luis DA, Primo D, Izaola O, Gomez E, Ortola A, et al. Role of the variant in adiponectin gene rs266729 on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors after a hypocaloric diet with the Mediterranean pattern Nutr 60 (2018): 1-5.

© 2016-2021, Copyrights Fortune Journals. All Rights Reserved!